Legal Opinion
In Re Wells
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 3, 1933No. 7150, 7178PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The petitions to review the conclusions and orders of the Referee in the above cases present two somewhat different phases of the samé legal problem. In both cases the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore filed a claim for allowance, prior to payment of dividends to general creditors, for tangible personal property tax bills against the bankrupt for the year 1933. The Referee disallowed the claims in both cases, and the City has petitioned for review.
In both eases the petitions in bankruptcy and the adjudication occurred after October 1,1932, and before January 1,1933.'…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- New Jersey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- New York v. JersawitSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Swarts v. HammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Dayton v. StanardSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- In re Sherwoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Magruder v. SuppleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in City of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1945
- Supplee v. MagruderDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Unemployment Reserves Commission v. MeilinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Baltimore Trust Co. v. Interocean Oil Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939