SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Appellants SSP Partners (“SSP”) and Metro Novelties, Inc. (“Metro”) and Appel-lee Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp. (“Gladstrong”) have all filed motions for rehearing.
Appellee Gladstrong asserts that the common law doctrine of “apparent manufacturer” is inconsistent with the statutory scheme of indemnity between manufacturers and sellers and did not survive enactment of the statute. Gladstrong therefore requests that we reconsider our previous ruling and affirm the trial court’s no-evidence summary judgment for Gladstrong.
Appellant Metro asserts that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- El Puerto De Liverpool, S.A. De C v. v. Servi Mundo Llantero S.A. De C.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Paramount Petroleum Corp. v. Taylor Rental CenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- In Re Western Star Trucks US, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
- In Re U-Haul International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Murphy Bros. Chevrolet Co. v. East Oakland Auto AuctionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.