Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM..

Stephen Crouse, proceeding on his own behalf, filed a petition in mandamus, which this Court has treated as a petition for review from the order of the State Employes’ Retirement Board (Board) that accepted and adopted the opinion of a hearing examiner and denied Crouse’s request to change his retirement benefits option election from non-disability, early retirement annuity to disability retirement. In a reply brief, Crouse repeats the question as counter-stated by the State Employes’ Retirement System (SERS), namely, whether a member of SERS who has retired and elected to receive…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. SCHOOL EMP. RETIREMENT BD.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Cosgrove v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Bittenbender v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Consolidated Freightways v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Olsen v. Pennsylvania State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Welsh v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API