People v. Jones
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In People v DerMartzex, 390 Mich 410; 213 NW2d 97 (1973), we held that evidence of a sexual act between the defendant and the victim preceding the one charged was admissible when the defendant is a member of the victim’s household. The Court of Appeals has extended DerMartzex in this case and in People v Hammer, 98 Mich App 471; 296 NW2d 283 (1980), to an antecedent sexual act between the defendant and a person other than the victim who is also a member of the victim’s household. We are unable to concur in this extension.
I
The defendant was charged with first-degree criminal sexual conduct.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. OliphantMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- People v. DerMartzexMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. LacalamitaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. SabinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- People v. EngelmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. RossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.