Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1983No. Docket 68026PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

In People v DerMartzex, 390 Mich 410; 213 NW2d 97 (1973), we held that evidence of a sexual act between the defendant and the victim preceding the one charged was admissible when the defendant is a member of the victim’s household. The Court of Appeals has extended DerMartzex in this case and in People v Hammer, 98 Mich App 471; 296 NW2d 283 (1980), to an antecedent sexual act between the defendant and a person other than the victim who is also a member of the victim’s household. We are unable to concur in this extension.

I

The defendant was charged with first-degree criminal sexual conduct.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. OliphantMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. People v. DerMartzexMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. LacalamitaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. SabinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. People v. EngelmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. RossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API