Legal Opinion

Bramlitt v. Kulman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

■ Certiorari. Before Judge Cann. Chatham superior coürt. April 9, 1904.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

A motion was made to dismiss the certiorari, because the defendant had not been served with the notice required by the Civil Code, § 4644. The case which was the subject-matter of the certiorari was tried in the justice’s court for the third •district of Chatham county, before Charles V. Hohenstein, notary public and ex-officio justice of the peace. The notice served upon the defendant was as follows: “Georgia, Chatham County. To E. J. Kulman, executor of the estate of Salomon Cohen. You are hereby notified of the sanction of a writ of certiorari in the case between you and myself tried in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Franke v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Bunn v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McConnell v. Folsom Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API