Bramlitt v. Kulman
Supreme Court of Georgia
■ Certiorari. Before Judge Cann. Chatham superior coürt. April 9, 1904.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
A motion was made to dismiss the certiorari, because the defendant had not been served with the notice required by the Civil Code, § 4644. The case which was the subject-matter of the certiorari was tried in the justice’s court for the third •district of Chatham county, before Charles V. Hohenstein, notary public and ex-officio justice of the peace. The notice served upon the defendant was as follows: “Georgia, Chatham County. To E. J. Kulman, executor of the estate of Salomon Cohen. You are hereby notified of the sanction of a writ of certiorari in the case between you and myself tried in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Franke v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Bunn v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- McConnell v. Folsom Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908