Legal Opinion

People v. Owusu

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1999PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wesley, J.

In this case we are called upon to decide whether an individual’s teeth can constitute a “dangerous instrument” within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (13). While the use of an object to produce injury is an appropriate analytical vehicle to determine whether an object is dangerous, the statute’s ordinary meaning, its legislative history and our jurisprudence persuade us that an individual’s body part does not constitute an instrument under the statute. We therefore reverse the order of the Appellate Division.

Defendant Maxwell Owusu is charged in a 13-count…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. CwiklaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. AdamkiewiczNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Tantaros v. Fox News Network, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  2. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. PlunkettNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. United States v. RochaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. State v. NeatherlinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API