Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Roth

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 6, 1985No. 61410PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

471 So.2d 29 (1985)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Burnett ROTH, Respondent.

No. 61410.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 6, 1985.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Robert D. Rosenbloom, Bar Counsel, Miami, for complainant.

Harvie S. DuVal of Greenfield & DuVal, North Miami, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This attorney-discipline proceeding is before us on the complaint of The Florida Bar and the report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The respondent in this proceeding was a long-time attorney and confidant of the Einbinder…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. The Florida Bar v. TunsilSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. The Florida Bar v. FarbsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. The Florida Bar v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Florida Bar In re RothSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API