Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Martin
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 12, 1989No. S-87-884PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
BRETT, Presiding Judge:
On March 14, 1987, appellee, Christopher Martin, received a traffic citation for violating the City of Tulsa’s Mandatory Seat Belt Ordinance. See Tulsa, Oklahoma, Rev.Ordinances Title 37, § 338. He filed a motion to dismiss in the Municipal Court of Tulsa County, challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance on equal protection grounds. The Honorable Millie Otey, Municipal Judge, declared the ordinance unconstitutional and granted a dismissal in Case No. 8796034.
Appellant, City of Tulsa, reserved this question of law pursuant to 22 O.S.1981, §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Spitznas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.