Legal Opinion

Spitznas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 29, 1982No. H-82-225PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

The petitioner was duly convicted in the District Court of Garfield County of the crimes of Rape and Sodomy, Case No. CRF-81-2. He was sentenced to 10 years for Rape in the First Degree and 5 years for Sodomy. A motion to the trial court for the sentences to run concurrently instead of consecutively was denied. Petitioner also made an oral motion for bail pending appeal which was denied on the basis of 22 O.S.1981, § 1077. Petitioner was then remanded to the custody of the Garfield County Sheriff and transported to a Department of Corrections facility.

Petitioner,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. Benjamin J. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Grant C. Affleck, United States of America v. Frank Kowalik, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. State v. ClabornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Dutton v. DixonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API