Legal Opinion

Grant v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 2006No. 04-CV-190PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant Roscoe Grant, Jr., a supervisor in the District of Columbia Office of the Corporation Counsel, 1 was placed on paid administrative leave pending an internal investigation into allegations that he had sexually harassed a subordinate. Before the investigation was completed, Grant filed this action against the District of Columbia in Superior Court, alleging that the decision to place him on leave without notice or a hearing violated his procedural rights under the Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act (“CMPA”), D.C.Code § 1-601.01 et seq. (2001), and the Due…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  5. Sydney O. Hall v. Claude A. FordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Local 36 International Ass'n of Firefighters v. RubinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. In Re the Thomas H. Gentry Revocable TrustHawaii Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API