Legal Opinion

State v. Wheeler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2001No. Nos. 69976-3; 70071-1PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

We must decide whether, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000), prior convictions used to prove a defendant is a persistent offender must be charged in the information, submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Unless and until the federal courts extend Apprendi to require such a result, we hold these additional protections are not required under the United States Constitution or by the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW.

FACTS

Petitioners John Wheeler…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  2. Varnum v. BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API