Legal Opinion

Portland California Steamship Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 3, 1944No. C. D. 889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This action comes before this court by reason of the collector’s refusal to accede to a protest' filed by the plaintiff against an assessment of 50 per centum duty levied under the provisions of section 466 of the Tariff Act of 1930 upon

The work •performed, materials purchased and/or equipment secured, as covered by item No.’s (a) c amount Shan $1,672.95, (b) c amount Shan $53.20, (c) c amount Shan $20.90, (d) c amounts Ch. $190.00 and Shan $356.25, (f) c amount Shan S205.20, as described under entry V-l-H, are free of duty under section 8115 of the Revised Statutes as amended by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Geo. Hall Coal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1905
  2. Dollar Steamship Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Pacific Transport Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API