Legal Opinion
In Re Parikh
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 4, 2008No. 8-16-72065PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
DOROTHY EISENBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
The matter before this Court is a motion for reconsideration brought by counsel for the Debtor, Sunil Parikh, (the “Debtor”) & his wife Meena Parikh (collectively the “Parikhs”) regarding this Court’s May 29, 2008 decision. The following constitutes this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as mandated by Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7052. This Court has jurisdiction of this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b) and 1384(b), and venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409(a). This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Dg Acquisition Corp. Debtor. Dg Creditor Corp., Trustee for the Dg Creditor Trust v. Ivette Dabah, Barbara Dabah, Renee Dabah, and Yvette DabahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Moon v. SCP Pool Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- American Electric Power Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Occidental Chemical Corp. (In re Maxus Energy Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- In re Energy Future Holdings Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- Shearer v. Titus (In re Titus)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012