Legal Opinion
Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1996No. M-8-85PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Currently pending before this Court is a motion by non-party witness Merrill Lynch (“Merrill Lynch,” “Merrill,” or “movant”), pursuant to Rules 45(C)(3)(A) and 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”), for an order quashing a subpoena duces tecum served on Merrill Lynch by plaintiffs. For the following reasons, Merrill Lynch’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
This motion arises from a civil antitrust action filed by plaintiffs in Federal District Court in the Eastern District of Arkansas. Plaintiffs, a group of twenty-four corporations…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Krewson v. City of QuincyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Celanese Corporation & Fiber Industries, Inc. v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- McCoy v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Moon v. SCP Pool Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Green v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- American Electric Power Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.