Legal Opinion

Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 1957No. 107Published

1Dissent 1

Opinion of

Mr. Justice Douglas, joined by Mr. Justice Black, dissenting, announced by Mr. Justice Brennan.

There are two reasons why I think this restraining order should be dissolved.

First, the provision for an injunction pendente lite gives the State the paralyzing power of a censor. A decree can issue ex parte — without a hearing and without any ruling or finding on the issue of obscenity. This provision is defended on the ground that it is only a little encroachment, that a hearing must be promptly given and a finding of obscenity promptly made. But every publisher knows what awful effect a…

Also in this document: Dissent · Brennan.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parmelee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. DennettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Learned v. . TillotsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Bolognino v. BologninoNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bolognino v. BologninoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API