Cherokee Public Service Co. v. Helena
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). Appellant contends that, under the terms of its franchises, it was only bound to furnish the gas in accordance with its contract, “contingent upon acts of Grod, and other things beyond the contrdl of the grantee herein;” and that it was not liable for failure to perform its contract; being unable to procure a supply of gas for distribution to the cities under its franchises from the pipe line company, a common carrier of gas through the State. It alleged that all the parties to the franchises knew that appellant company had no gas wells or supply of its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Salem v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Nilson v. JonesboroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Ex parte KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Robbins v. PlantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Woodruff v. ShockeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Agape Church, Inc. v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.