Legal Opinion

Scott v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 23, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Now. John G. Parh, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, J.

Tire plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from an order and judgment of the circuit court of Jackson county, striking out three petitions filed in the cause by him in compliance with sections 613 and 623, Eevised Statutes 1899, and without prejudice dismissing plaintiff’s case.

Formal parts omitted, the original petition stricken out reads as follows:

“Now comes plaintiff herein and for his cause of action against defendant says:
“First. That on or about the'first day of June, 1893, plaintiff was indebted to one William H. Mc-Lellan in the sum of two thousand seven hundred and *656fifty dollars on a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kansas City Suburban Belt Railroad v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Clark v. Covenant Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Beattie Manufacturing Co. v. GerardiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Southworth Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Eudaley v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rose v. City of WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Voorhees v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Diener v. Star-Chronicle Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Pridemore v. FifeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API