Legal Opinion

Pridemore v. Fife

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1914Published

Appeal from Howard Circuit Court. — Eon. A. E. Waller, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.

Plaintiff purchased a jack from defendants for breeding purposes for which he claims the Jack was unfitted and worthless. He brought this action by petition in two counts; the first on a warranty and the second on a charge of fraud and deceit. There was a general verdict for plaintiff in the trial court, without naming upon which count it was found. Afterwards, on defendant’s motion, a new trial was granted, several reasons being assigned therefor by the court. Plaintiff appealed from that order.

*333Among other reasons as to the first count, the court stated that the verdict was against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jamison v. CopherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Karnes v. WinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Cunningham v. AtterburyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Sain v. RooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Scott v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API