Legal Opinion
Newman v. Bloomingdale's
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1982No. 80 Civ. 3238PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bonny Newman commenced this action under the Constitution of the United States and the federal civil rights laws seeking damages from defendants Bloomingdale’s and its alleged employee, Diane Frugis, for depriving plaintiff of certain constitutional rights. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
The factual allegations in the complaint, which for purposes of this motion must be taken as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- John C. Greco v. Orange Memorial Hospital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fisk v. LettermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Modesto Cruz v. Peter Donnelly, John Adams, a & P Food Stores and William RayburnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Parker v. Grand Hyatt HotelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Bang v. Utopia RestaurantDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Prowisor v. Bon-Ton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.