Legal Opinion

Rew v. Beneficial Standard Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1952No. 32033PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an action on an insurance contract denominated “World-Wide Hospital and Surgical Expense Policy for Family Groups.”

For a consideration, defendant insurer issued to plaintiffs, in Spokane, a policy wherein it agreed, among other things, to pay for plaintiffs’ benefit the sum of ten dollars per day while either of them

“. . . because of sickness or accidental bodily injury covered by this policy, shall be necessarily confined as a resident bed patient within any hospital upon the advice of, and regularly attended by, a legally qualified physician or surgeon, but not to exceed ninety days…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNichols v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Kane v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hamilton Trucking Service, Inc. v. Automobile Insurance Co. of HartfordWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Richards v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Merlin v. RodineWashington Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Truck Insurance Exchange v. RohdeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. HartsoughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Miller v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. American Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Patterson v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API