Legal Opinion
State v. Bolar
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 16, 1987No. 53017PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, C.J.
The state appeals from the dismissal of the second count of the grand jury’s indictment, which charged the defendant with violating R.C.. 2913.46(A). The writer of this opinion agrees with the trial court that the cited statute is unconstitutional, albeit for a different reason. The majority of the court concludes that the statute is constitutional and enforceable. Hence, we reverse the dismissal judgment.
R.C. 2913.46(A) provides:
“No individual shall knowingly possess, buy, sell, use, alter, accept, or transfer food stamp coupons in any manner not authorized by the ‘Food Stamp Act of 1977,’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Blue Cross of Northeast Ohio v. RatchfordOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KentOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gonzalez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- State v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1992