Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Kingsbury

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1963No. Civ. No. 21060PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

Appellants, the executor and attorney, appeal from the probate court’s order which denies them compensation for extraordinary services rendered during the administration of the estate of Eella Adair Walker. Two issues are presented, first, when services of the type listed in Probate Code section 902 are rendered, has the court discretion to deny extra compensation, and second, did the court here abuse its discretion in denying compensation for extraordinary services ?

*794In her will the decedent named her attorney, Hilary H. Crawford, as executor. The executor employed his son, Hilary H.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Estate of FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Dow v. HutchinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. CavanaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Estate of GilkisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Estate of TryninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Estate of TurinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API