People v. Cavanaugh

MOSK. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him on three counts of armed robbery.1 He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in limiting the number of corroborating alibi witnesses to be brought from Massachusetts to testify in his behalf, that it was prejudicial error to admit evidence of another robbery committed by defendant in California some two weeks after those charged, and that he *264was identified at an unfairly constituted lineup. We have concluded that these contentions are without merit and hence that the judgment should be affirmed.

At 9:30 p.m. on November 12,…