United States Ex Rel. Means v. Solem
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
NICHOL, Chief Judge.
The petitioner, Russell Means, seeks a writ of Habeas Corpus claiming that his confinement in the South Dakota State Penitentiary is based upon an unlawful conviction obtained in state court. Petitioner raises many claims. His first claim is that he was forced to surrender his absolute right to trial by jury as guaranteed by the 6th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution because of (a) the combination of alleged mammoth prejudicial pretrial publicity concerning the petitioner and/or the American Indian Movement, (b) the trial court’s…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stumes v. SolemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1981
- United States Ex Rel. Means v. SolemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1979
- TERRY v. DRUMMONDCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2025
- White v. SolemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1979