Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Means v. Solem

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 7, 1979No. CIV79-4049PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

NICHOL, Chief Judge.

The petitioner Ted Means having been convicted of riot to obstruct justice seeks a writ of habeas corpus in accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 2254. The petitioner raises the following claims in his writ:(1) that the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury on the defenses of self defense, defense of others, and ignorance or mistake of fact was a denial of his rights to due process of law, to trial by jury, and to require the prosecution to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt;(2) that in view of the petitioner’s alleged purpose of assembling…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. United States of America, Ex Rel. Ted Means v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Sioux Falls, South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Williams v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API