United States Ex Rel. Means v. Solem
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
NICHOL, Chief Judge.
The petitioner Ted Means having been convicted of riot to obstruct justice seeks a writ of habeas corpus in accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 2254. The petitioner raises the following claims in his writ:(1) that the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury on the defenses of self defense, defense of others, and ignorance or mistake of fact was a denial of his rights to due process of law, to trial by jury, and to require the prosecution to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt;(2) that in view of the petitioner’s alleged purpose of assembling…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Ted Means v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Sioux Falls, South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Williams v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.