Mathilda Fioravanti v. Quirino Fioravanti
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The question is whether the District Court may in its discretion reduce or cancel, at a later date, periodic installments of payments for maintenance as of the date when application for such relief is made. We re-affirm our decision in Dausuel v. Dausuel, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 275, 276, 195 F.2d 774, 775, that the court may do so. Cf. Kephart v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 380, 193 F.2d 677, 684, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 944, 72 S.Ct. 557, 96 L.Ed. 702; 6 A.L.R.2d 1277, 1328.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kephart v. KephartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Dausuel v. DausuelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steadman v. SteadmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Trezevant v. TrezevantDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Movius v. MoviusMontana Supreme Court · 1974
- Rhodes v. GilpinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- DeFeo v. DeFeoDelaware Family Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.