Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Daniel Zavala v. Richard Ives

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2015No. 13-56615Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCallahan, Circuit Judge

At issue is how much of the time that an alien spends in the custody of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE) prior to the commencement of a criminal sentence must be credited against that alien’s sentence for illegal reentry. I agree with the majority that, under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), an alien is eligible for credit for all time spent in ICE custody from the day he or she is indicted or criminally charged. On that day, the alien becomes subject to the U.S. Attorney General’s control and thus is in “official detention” within the meaning of § 3585(b) as the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Ruben Cepeda-LunaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Tablada v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Lewis L. Boniface v. P.M. Carlson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API