Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Feinberg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*995Memorandum. The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the orders of respondent adjudging each of the petitioners in criminal contempt vacated.

In the circumstances disclosed in this record none of the petitioners was accorded an opportunity to make any statement on his own behalf or otherwise to be heard. That each was afforded an opportunity to leave the courtroom before being held summarily in contempt did not serve this purpose. In short, none of the petitioners received the minimum procedural rights to which he was entitled under our holding in Matter of Katz v Murtagh…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Katz v. MurtaghNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. O'Connell v. TaddeoNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. LaDuca v. BerginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Roajas v. RecantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Kuriansky v. AzamNew York Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API