Legal Opinion

Grosch v. Kessler

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The preponderance of evidence sustains the finding of the Appellate Division that the deeds recorded in 1904 from Weeks to Medary and from Weeks to Barney, were forgeries and void.

The defendant, who received a conveyance in 1913, was a purchaser for value and in good faith. The plaintiff seeks the aid of equity, and must submit to the condition that he do equity himself. There must be reimbursement to the defendant for any moneys expended by her in the discharge of assessments for improvements (Thomas v. Evans, 105 N. Y. 601, 612, 613; Mickles v. Dillaye, 17 N. Y. 80, 86; Satterlee v. Kobbe,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Mickles v. . Dillaye and OthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Satterlee v. . KobbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Thomas v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . HavenNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. ACLI Government Securities, Inc. v. RhoadesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Hollywood, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  3. Pecorella v. Greater Buffalo Press, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Vinlis Construction Co. v. RoreckNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Boxill v. BoxillNew York Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API