Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 15, 2011No. 08-50TPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

This tax refund case is before the court following trial in Washington, D.C. At issue is whether plaintiff is liable for a so-called “responsible officer” penalty imposed by section 6672(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C.). For the reasons that follow, the court finds that plaintiff, indeed, was liable for the penalty in question and, therefore, is not entitled to the refund he seeks.

I. FACTS

To say the least, Mr. Timothy L. Jenkins (plaintiff) has had a distinguished career, with a long list of achievements that includes appointments as the interim…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Begier v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. McBrideDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2012
  2. Heger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Roger Byrne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. Schlabach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API