Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Viscosky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1924No. Appeals, 141, 142, 143, 144 and 145PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Appellants were jointly charged with having maliciously destroyed a railroad bridge belonging to the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. The indictment contained two counts; the first charging a felony under the Act of May 9, 1913, P. L. 186; the second a misdemeanor under the Act of March 31, 1860, P. L. 382, pi. 147. They were convicted on both counts, but sentenced on only the first. Sentence on the second count was suspended, and the assignment as to that count need not be considered: Com. v. Mellon, 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 20, 22.

The bridge was blown np by the use of an…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Commonwealth v. SparduteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Commonwealth v. DeitrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. NowalkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Commonwealth v. GominoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. BubnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API