Legal Opinion

White & Yarborough v. Lucius L. Dailey

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1955No. 18-31099PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the attorneys for plaintiff-appellee from that part of an agreed judgment for $6000 entered in a Texas workmen’s compensation suit 1 which awarded appellant, as plaintiff’s attorneys, a fee of $1000, or one-sixth thereof, instead of $2000, or one-third thereof, the amount plaintiff had agreed with his counsel that they should receive. While, therefore, the plaintiff is named as appellee, and the appeal, if successful, will reduce the $5000 awarded to plaintiff in the judgment to $4000, the appeal does not represent an effort by appellant to obtain a fee greater than…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Amstar Corporation v. Southern Pacific Transport Company of Texas and LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Sea-Land Service, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, and Harrington & Company, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Association of New York, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Earl Dugas, Jr. v. Trans Union CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Armando Ybarra v. Dish Network, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  5. Rick Strouse, Floyd Dean and Kenneth Moates v. J. Kinson Cook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API