Legal Opinion
Fox v. City of Pasadena
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1935No. 7672PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, who were nonresidents of California, filed a bill in equity against the city of Pasadena, a municipal corporation of the state of California, hereinafter called the “City,” on behalf of themselves and all other nonresident taxpayers within Municipal Improvement District No. 3 in the City of Pasadena. The defendant moved to dismiss the action upon several grounds; among others, upon the ground that the facts stated in the • bill ■ of complaint did not constitute a *949cause of action, and also because such facts showed laches. The court granted the motion on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- McIntire v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Heine v. Levee CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Trickey v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Bryant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Ballf v. KranzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Durst v. County of ColusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hanson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.