Nordstrom, Inc. v. Windom-Hall
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Claimant suffers from a number of conditions, including several vestibular disorders, encephalopathy and dysthymia, all of which she asserts are compensable because they resulted from her exposure to toxic or noxious fumes at her place of employment. Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding the compensability of one of the vestibular disorders, perilymph fistulas. Claimant cross-petitions, contending that the Board erred in determining that her other conditions are not compensable and in denying claimant attorney fees and penalties.
Claimant’s claim form…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- SAIF Corp. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.