Legal Opinion

Watson v. Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDew, J.

Eespondent made claim before tbe Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Commission for award of damages alleged to have been sustained while in the course of his employment by appellant Marshall’s U. S. Auto Supply Company, Inc. On the first hearing the Commission granted the respondent compensation. Upon later review by the full Commission, compensation was denied and the Commission found that the condition complained of was not the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of the respondent’s employment, one member of the Commission dissenting. From the latter action of the Commission…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Sawtell v. Stern Bros. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Russell v. Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Baker v. Scott County Milling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spradling v. International Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Evans v. Farmers Mutual Hail InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Robinson v. Federal Telephone & Radio Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API