Lincoln v. Waterbury Button Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The sole question át bar is whether defendant’s “Kasterslides” infringe the patent fairly represented by plaintiff’s Domes of Silence. Both are smooth and polished substitutes for castors, intended (e. g.) to be driven by the force of a hammer into the bottom of the leg of a chair or other piece of furniture, which then (it is said) slides as readily over a rug or carpet as if it had a rolling castor in the same place, When this patent *620was before us in the case above cited it was specifically pointed out by Coxe, J., that the patented object was by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hanna v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sidney Blumenthal & Co. v. Salt's Textile Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
- Lincoln v. Mattatuck Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Lincoln v. Mattatuck Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1926