Steve W. Mountford v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge:
U.S. Air Force veteran Steve W. Mount-ford appeals through counsel from a February 26, 2009, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied entitlement to restoration of benefits for his service-connected schizophrenia prior to May 25, 2004, because he was found to be a “fugitive felon” under 38 U.S.C. § 5313B.
On December 27, 2001, Congress enacted 38 U.S.C. § 5313B. That statute bars veterans and their dependents from receiving VA benefits while veterans or their beneficiaries are “fugitive felons.” 38 U.S.C. § 5313B(a). Mr. Mountford argues that the Board’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
- Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012