Legal Opinion

Steve W. Mountford v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided June 21, 2011No. 09-1759PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge:

U.S. Air Force veteran Steve W. Mount-ford appeals through counsel from a February 26, 2009, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied entitlement to restoration of benefits for his service-connected schizophrenia prior to May 25, 2004, because he was found to be a “fugitive felon” under 38 U.S.C. § 5313B.

On December 27, 2001, Congress enacted 38 U.S.C. § 5313B. That statute bars veterans and their dependents from receiving VA benefits while veterans or their beneficiaries are “fugitive felons.” 38 U.S.C. § 5313B(a). Mr. Mountford argues that the Board’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
  2. Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API