Legal Opinion · Dissent

Constance Copeland v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided November 14, 2012No. 11-2408Published

1DissentHagel, Judge

In a July 27, 2012, briefing order, issued at my request, the Court ordered the parties to consider 38 U.S.C. § 7261, the Court’s scope of review statute, and submit memoranda of law discussing whether the Court has the power to strike down a *93statute on constitutional grounds. Despite the parties’ agreement that the Court does have such power, and despite the Court’s prior decisions in numerous cases that implicitly presumed, that the Court has such power6 (one of which, I must note with some embarrassment, I authored7), I remain unconvinced that this Court has the power to entertain facial…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API