Legal Opinion

Phillips v. 630 McKinley Square Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Recovery here is claimed to be justified by the fact that the sidewalk had been painted and was slippery when wet by rain. The paint had been applied long before the accident and was thoroughly dry and somewhat worn. No proof was adduced to establish that the paint was in anywise defective or contained improper materials or had been improperly applied. To hold abutting owners and the city liable in such state of facts would be to impose an intolerable burden.

If this judgment is affirmed, the mere painting of the curb of sidewalks, to mark the stoppage places of buses could, on wet days, give…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wessels v. Service Merchandise, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Bacon v. Altamont Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Larussa v. Shell Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Radaelli v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Bock v. Loumarita Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API