Howard v. Associated Grocers
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
Defendant-appellants Donald B. Howard and Betty Lou Howard appeal from an order granting plaintiff-appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
We must answer only one question on appeal: Did the purchase agreement entered into between Associated Grocers and the temporary trustee in bankruptcy for Howard’s Markets, Inc., operate to discharge the Howards from their continuing guarantee of the financial obligations of Howard’s Markets, Inc., to Associated Grocers?
The facts necessary for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fagerberg v. Phoenix Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Adams v. DionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Hovatter v. Shell Oil CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Ray Korte Chevrolet v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Poling v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Tenet Healthsystem TGH, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- General Electric Credit Corp. of Tennessee v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- McClellan Mortgage Co. v. StoreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Data Sales Co. v. Diamond Z ManufacturingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.