Commonwealth v. Delrio
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.
We are obliged to reverse the conviction of the defendant, Delrio (the case to stand for a new trial), by reason of errors in the denial of the defendant’s motion for voir dire regarding an alleged admission by him, the failure to instruct adequately on an issue of identification of the defendant, and the improper handling of a previous incident in which evidence was suppressed as illegally seized. In the course of outlining the substance of the trial, we indicate how these problems arose; then we elaborate upon each.
The Trial. The defendant was indicted and tried for the knowing possession…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ChristianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GagliardiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LunaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.