Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawrence Clark Reber

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1989No. 88-1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Lawrence Clark Reber appeals from an order of the district court that revoked his probation, reinstated it for the maximum period allowable by law, and ordered him to pay certain additional restitution. Because the findings upon which the trial court based revocation of Reber’s probation are without support in the record, we reverse. 1

I

Reber pled guilty to receiving stolen property and was sentenced in February 1984 to six months incarceration followed by three years probation. The probation was conditioned on payment of restitution “to his victims within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Rickey Dean SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Fred Anthony HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Rita RifeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. United States v. EnglesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. DisneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Paul GarfinkleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API