Legal Opinion

United States v. Engles

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2015No. 14-7052PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Billy Engles appeals from the revocation of his federal supervised release based on a criminal conviction in state court. Because his direct appeal asserts only a collateral attack on his state court conviction, we dismiss his appeal.

Defendant is a registered sex offender in the State of Oklahoma. In 2013, he was on federal supervised release for an unrelated federal offense. A condition of Defendant’s supervised release stated that he “shall not commit another federal, state or local crime.”

On September 5, 2013, Defendant accompanied his then live-in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Guadalupe GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. George H. LustigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. DisneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Lawrence Clark ReberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Noreja v. Commissioner, SSACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Eighteen Seventy v. JaysonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  4. SEC v. GenAudio Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. Vincent v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API