Legal Opinion
Geisler by Geisler v. Wyeth Laboratories
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 8, 1989No. 88-1094-KPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATRICK F. KELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by Aaron Geisler as the result of his inoculation with a DTP vaccine manufactured by defendant Wyeth Laboratories (“Wyeth”). Plaintiffs are represented by the law firm of Michaud, Hutton & Bradshaw (“Michaud firm”), which has regularly represented similarly situated claimants before this court. Defendant Wyeth is, and has been, regularly represented by the law firm of McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn & Herrington (“McDonald, Tinker”).
Recently, Randall…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eleanor Schiessle v. Donald E. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Leon G. Smith and Karen H. Smith v. D. Keith Whatcott, Phillip Taylor, Taywin, Inc., Taycor Ltd. And Burke ClowardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Field v. FreedmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981
- Nemours Foundation v. Gilbane, Aetna, Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Chrispens v. Coastal Refining & Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- LeaseAmerica Corp. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- Graham v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Richers v. Marsh & McLennan Group AssociatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.