Legal Opinion
Pallares v. Seinar
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 12, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2011-201026; No. 27364PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
Ursula R. Pallares (“Pallares”) brought this civil suit alleging five claims against two of her neighbors, Sharon R. Seinar and Lisa A. Maseng (“Respondents”). The circuit court granted partial summary judgment to Respondents on Pallares’s claims for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and civil conspiracy. Pallares appealed, and this Court certified *364the case for review pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I. FACTS
As one party aptly describes the situation, “Appellant and the Respondents are neighbors who obviously do not get along.” The three…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Walbeck v. I'On Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Brown v. Sojourner (In re Estate of Brown)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- ACS Technologies Group, Inc. v. Robert W. PersonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
- Calvin Hoagland v. David BennettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Carter v. BryantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.