Dailey v. Linnehan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Replevin brought in the district court for Hennepin county. At the trial, before Rea, J., the jury found for defendant and assessed the value of the property at $2,000; Plaintiff appeals from an order refusing a new trial. A former appeal is reported in 39 Minn. 346.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
It was held on a former appeal in this case (39 Minn. 346; 40 N. W. Rep. 250) that the evidence produced on the previous trial upon the disputed question of ownership of the goods in controversy was for the jury. Upon a new trial the case was.submitted to the jury, and resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The property, being saloon fixtures and furniture, was in the possession *278of one Fitzgerald, and was attached as his, and he, being insolvent, thereupon assigned the same to the defendant for the benefit of his creditors. The fixtures were purchased of the former owner on the joint…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dailey v. LinnehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lehmann v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897