Dailey v. Linnehan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, refusing a new trial, after a trial before Young, 3., and a jury, and verdict directed for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The dispute here is as to the ownership of certain saloon fixtures and furniture, which came into defendant’s possession as the assignee of M. 3. Fitzgerald, an insolvent. The plaintiff, who is Fitzgerald’s cousin, claims that the fixtures were sold to her by one Schurch; while defendant contends that the sale by said Schurch was to Fitzgerald, instead of to the plaintiff. It seems to be admitted that a bill of sale was made to plaintiff by Schurch that afterwards the fixtures were placed in a room which was fitted up, and for about three years — until the assignment — kept, as a saloon. The…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Dailey v. LinnehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890