Legal Opinion

Dorman v. B & W Construction Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1988No. 87CA1467PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Charles A. Dorman (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which affirmed a hearing officer’s order denying claimant’s petition to reopen. We set aside the order and remand with directions.

Claimant’s petition to reopen because of a change of condition was supported by his testimony and the opinion of Dr. Harder. Dr. Harder estimated that claimant’s permanent disability had increased by two percent. In addition, both claimant and Dr. Harder testified that claimant’s general physical condition had worsened.

The petition to reopen was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Dziewior v. Michigan General Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Chavez v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATE OF COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Industrial Commission v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Osborne v. Industrial Com'n of State of Colo.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donald B. Murphy Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Richards v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Brickell v. Business MacHines, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API