Legal Opinion

Central Railroad v. Baird

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 7, 1908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On error io the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported ante p. 120.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

(tUJQíekg, Chiee Justice.

The several plaintiffs in error, who were the prosecutors below, attack by these proceedings the constitutionality of three supplements to the act for the taxation of railroad and canal property, approved respectively on the 5th of April, the 18th of April and the 18th of *773May, in the year 1906. The original act was passed in the year 1884. The scheme of taxation provided by it was as follows: After declaring that all the property of any railroad or canal company not used for railroad or canal purposes should be assessed and…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Jersey City v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  2. NY, SUSQUEHANNA AND WRR CO. v. VermeulenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. State v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  4. Clark v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. NJ State League of Municipalities v. KimmelmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API