Legal Opinion
White v. Lombardy Dresses, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1941Published
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have sued defendant for infringement of two dress design patents. The action was referred to a Special Master for trial. The issues were tried before him and he has duly made and filed his report. The Master found that the design patents of the plaintiffs were valid, and infringed by the defendant and that the infringement by the defendant was deliberate and wilful.
The matter now comes to me on the application of the plaintiffs to confirm the report of the Master.
Patent No. 121449 and 121452, each for a design for dress ensemble, were issued on July 9, 194G,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- A. C. Gilbert Co. v. ShemitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Strause Gas Iron Co. v. William M. Crane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Graff, Washbourne & Dunn v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Neufeld-Furst & Co. v. Jay-Day Frocks Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.